“Memory can change the shape of a room; it can change the color of a car. And memories can be distorted. They’re just an interpretation, they’re not a record, and they’re irrelevant if you have the facts.”
“Facts, not memories. That’s how you investigate. I know, it’s what I used to do”
Archive for May, 2007
|
|
||
WichitsSucks.org has been conducting an ongoing poll asking What’s the worst thing about Wichita?
Think you know the answer? Well here are the official results, although the poll is ongoing and therefor the results are sure to change as time goes on..
So far it seems as though the majority of the voters (37.47%) think that the worst thing in Wichita is “The People Suck” well at least the lowest ranked was “This Site” referring to WichitaSucks.org at 0.32%. Does your opinion differ? If so, go to the poll and cast your vote!
|
|
||
For the first time since 1997 the minimum wage in the United States will be increased. The current federal minimum wage in the U. S. is $5.15, before the end of this summer it will be increased $0.70 an hour to $5.85, in 2008 it will rise another $0.70 and buy the end of 2009 the minimum wage will be $7.25 an hour.
Take a few moments to understand what his means to everyone. Unskilled workers at fast food restaurants will be making over $7 an hour. Have you been to a fast food restaurant lately? Have you ever worked at one? There is no way this work is worth $7 an hour. Think about what this will do to the cost of a hamburger, it is already about $1 for a lousy hamburger. Think of how many more illegal immigrants will get work at much lower wages than legal citizens due to this legislation.
For many years it has been a matter of conventional wisdom among economists that the minimum wage causes fewer jobs to exist than would be the case without it. This is simply a matter of price theory, taught in every economics textbook, requiring no elaborate analysis to justify. Were this not the case, there would be no logical reason why the minimum wage could not be set at $10, $100, or $1 million per hour.
Minimum wage legislation artificially inflates the value of the work and the worker. The entire economy suffers in the form of increased cost, lower overall quality & value, and reduced customer service of the goods and services purchased. Companies are forced to raise the prices they charge and also must reduce their cost of goods sold. They do this by using fewer workers to perform the work which results in fewer overall jobs. This increases unemployment among low-wage workers, harming rather than helping the poorest workers. A greater number of workers are willing to work at the higher wage while a smaller numbers of jobs will be available at the higher wage. Companies can and will be more selective in who they employ thus the least skilled and unexperienced will typically get excluded. A simple classical economic analysis of supply and demand implies that by mandating a price floor above the equilibrium wage, minimum wage laws should cause unemployment.
Effects of Minimum Wage:
- Reduces demand for workers. This may manifest itself through a reduction in the number of hours worked by individuals, or through a reduction in the number of jobs.[1]
- Hurts the least employable by making them unemployable, in effect pricing them out of the market.[2]
- Reduces profit margins of business owners employing minimum wage workers, thus encouraging a move to businesses that do not employ low skill workers.
- Increases prices for customers of employers of minimum wage workers, which would pass through to the general price level.[3]
- Reduces economic growth by skewing factor-choice incentives away from the optimum choice.[4]
- Minimum-wage legislation, by its very nature, benefits some at the expense of the least experienced, least productive, and poorest workers.”[2]
- Is a limit on the freedom of both employers and employees. Minimum wage laws make it illegal for employers to pay workers less than the minimum wage. This also prevents workers from being able to provide labor or services for less than the minimum. For example, during the apartheid era in South Africa, white trade unions lobbied for the introduction of minimum wage laws so as to exclude black workers from the labor market. By preventing black workers from selling their labor for less than white workers, the black workers were prevented from competing for jobs held by whites.[5]
- Although it is the employer who is fined and/or imprisoned for violations, the workers also lose their freedom, albeit indirectly.
- Decreases opportunities for low-skilled workers to gain the training and responsibility they need to move up the wage ladder.
- Increases the cost of government social programs due to assistance programs aiding the laid-off/unemployed workers.
- Is less effective than the Earned Income Tax Credit at targeting the truly needy, and is more damaging to businesses.
- Decreases human capital by encouraging people to enter the job market instead of pursuing further education.
- Reduces the international competitiveness of a nation by raising the cost of factor inputs, and therefore output, relative to the level of other countries. It is argued that this is particularly problematic in developing economies.
Minimum wage laws are a self contradictory policy. Let the employees and employers decide what a job is worth.
References
- http://www.newamerica.net/publications/articles/2001/the_case_for_a_living_wage
- http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa106.html
- Aaronson, D. and E. French, 2006. Output Prices and the Minimum Wage. Employment Policies Institute.
- Keiner, M. and R. Kudrle, 2000. Does Regulation Affect Economic Outcomes? The Case of Dentistry. Journal of Law and Economics.
- Williams, Walter (1989): South Africa’s War Against Capitalism, Praeger Publishers
|
|
||
On May 17, 2007, Rosie O’Donnell rhetorically asked, “655,000 Iraqi civilians dead. Who are the terrorists?” She further explained, “If you were in Iraq and another country, the United States, the richest in the world, invaded your country and killed 655,000 of your citizens, what would you call us?” [1]. The Republican commentators saying that Rosie thinks American troops are terrorists and Elisabeth’s not defending her caused a heated argument between the two on May 23, 2007.[2]
I have never like Rosie, particularly her position on the Gun Control issue. I beleive that her comments on May 17th and May 23, 2007 are not only irresponsible but are anti American. Her words are insulting to our troops. She denies that her implication was that the United States or our troops are terrorists. But Watch the video, read the transcripts. What other statement could she have possibly been trying to make? No matter what a persons position is on the war in Iraq or any war the United States may be involved in that person should still respect the troops that have defended their freedom throughout our history. The reason she can even make comments like that is because our troops have died defending our and her freedom.
|
|
||
Etymology
French corruption, from Latin corruptio
Noun
corruption (uncountable and countable; plural corruptions)
- The act of corrupting or of impairing integrity, virtue, or moral principle; the state of being corrupted or debased; loss of purity or integrity; depravity; wickedness; impurity; bribery.
- It was necessary, by exposing the gross corruptions of monasteries, . . . to exite popular indignation against them. — Hallam
- They abstained from some of the worst methods of corruption usual to their party in its earlier days. — Bancroft
- Usage note: Corruption, when applied to officers, trustees, etc., signifies the inducing a violation of duty by means of pecuniary considerations. — Abbott
- The act of corrupting or making putrid, or state of being corrupt or putrid; decomposition or disorganization, in the process of putrefaction; putrefaction; deterioration.
- The product of corruption; putrid matter.
- The decomposition of biological matter.
- (computing) The destruction of data by manipulation of parts of it, usually a result of imperfections in storage or transmission media which randomly alter parts of the data.
- The act of changing, or of being changed, for the worse; departure from what is pure, simple, or correct; as, a corruption of style; corruption in language.
- (linguistics) A word that has adopted from another language but whose spelling has been changed through misunderstanding, transcription error, mishearing, etc.
- Something that is evil but is supposed to be good.
- The inducing and accelerating of putrefaction is a subject of very universal inquiry; for corruption is a reciprocal to generation. — Francis Bacon.
- Parts of a machine can be corrupted, meaning broken.
|
|
||
in·teg·ri·ty (Än-tÄ•g‘rÄ-tÄ“)
n.
- Steadfast adherence to a strict moral or ethical code.
- The state of being unimpaired; soundness.
- The quality or condition of being whole or undivided; completeness.
[Middle English integrite, from Old French, from Latin integritÄs, soundness, from integer, whole, complete.]
|
|
||
Portions from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Catherine “Kitty” Genovese
Born July 07, 1935, New York - Died March 13, 1964 (aged 28)
Catherine Susan Genovese (July 7, 1935[1] — March 13, 1964), commonly known as Kitty Genovese, was a New York City woman who was stabbed to death near her home in the Kew Gardens section of Queens, New York.[2] The circumstances of her murder and the apparent reaction (or lack thereof) of her neighbors were reported by a newspaper article published two weeks later and prompted investigation into the psychological phenomenon that became known as the bystander effect or “Genovese syndrome.”[3]
Life
Born in New York City, Genovese was the oldest of five children in a middle class Italian American family and was raised in Brooklyn. After her mother witnessed a murder in the city, the family chose to move to Connecticut in 1954. Genovese, however, nineteen at the time, chose to remain in the city, where she lived for nine years. Kitty eventually took a job as a bar manager at Ev’s 11th Hour Sports Bar on Jamaica Avenue in Hollis, Queens. At the time of her murder, she lived in a Queens apartment she shared with her partner, Mary Ann Zielonko.[4]
Attack
Genovese had driven home in the early morning of March 13, 1964. Arriving home at about 3:15 a.m. and parking about 100 feet (30 m) from her apartment’s door, she was approached by Winston Moseley. Moseley ran after her and quickly overtook her, stabbing her twice in the back. When Genovese screamed out, her cries were heard by several neighbors; but on a cold night with the windows closed, only a few of them recognized the sound as a cry for help. When one of the neighbors shouted at the attacker, “Let that girl alone!”, Moseley ran away and Genovese slowly made her way towards her own apartment around the end of the building. She was seriously injured, but now out of view of those few who may have had reason to believe she was in need of help.
Records of the earliest calls to police are unclear and were certainly not given a high priority by the police. One witness said his father called police after the initial attack and reported that a woman was “beat up, but got up and was staggering around.”[5]
Other witnesses observed Moseley enter his car and drive away, only to return ten minutes later. He systematically searched the parking lot, train station, and small apartment complex, ultimately finding Genovese, who was lying, barely conscious, in a hallway at the back of the building. Out of view of the street and of those who may have heard or seen any sign of the original attack, he proceeded to further attack her, stabbing her several more times. Knife wounds in her hands suggested that she attempted to defend herself from him. While she lay dying, he sexually assaulted her. He stole about $49 from her and left her dying in the hallway. The attacks spanned approximately half an hour.
A few minutes after the final attack, a witness, Karl Ross, called the police. Police and medical personnel arrived within minutes of Ross’ call; Genovese was taken away by ambulance and died en route to the hospital. Later investigation by police and prosecutors revealed that approximately a dozen (but almost certainly not the 38 cited in the Times article) individuals nearby had heard or observed portions of the attack, though none could have seen or been aware of the entire incident.[6] Only one witness (Joseph Fink) was aware she was stabbed in the first attack, and only Karl Ross was aware of it in the second attack. Many were entirely unaware that an assault or homicide was in progress; some thought that what they saw or heard was a lover’s quarrel or a drunken brawl or a group of friends leaving the bar outside when Moseley first approached Genovese.
Burial
Following her murder, Kitty Genovese was buried in a family grave at Lakeview Cemetery in New Canaan, Connecticut. The family requested to keep the burial location within the cemetery private, and visitors not be directed to the grave by cemetery personnel.
Perpetrator
Winston Moseley, a business machine operator, was later apprehended in connection with another crime; he confessed not only to the murder of Kitty Genovese, but to two other murders, both involving sexual assaults. Subsequent psychiatric examinations suggested that Moseley was a necrophiliac. He was convicted of murder and sentenced to death.
Moseley gave a confession to the police where he detailed the attack, corroborating the physical evidence at the scene. His motive for the attack was simply “to kill a woman.” Moseley stated that he got up that night around 2:00 a.m., leaving his wife asleep at home, and drove around to find a victim. He spied Genovese and followed her to the parking lot.
Moseley also testified at his own trial where he further described the attack, leaving no question that he was the killer.
The initial death sentence was reduced to an indeterminate sentence of 20 years to life imprisonment on June 1, 1967. The New York Court of Appeals found that Moseley should have been able to argue that he was “medically insane” at the sentencing hearing when the trial court found that he had been legally sane.
In 1968, during a trip to a Buffalo, New York hospital for surgery (precipitated by a soup can he placed in his own rectum as a pretext to leave prison), Moseley overpowered a guard and beat him up to the point that his eyes were bloody. He then took a bat and swung it at the closest person to him and took five hostages, sexually assaulting one of them, before he was recaptured alive. He also participated in the later Attica prison uprising.[7]
Moseley remained in prison after being denied parole a twelfth time on February 3, 2006. A previous parole hearing included his defense that “For a victim outside, it’s a one-time or one-hour or one-minute affair, but for the person who’s caught, it’s forever.”[8] He will be eligible for parole again in 2008.
Public Reaction
The story of Genovese’s murder became an almost-instant parable about the supposed callousness, or at least apathy to others’ plight, of either New York City, urban America, or humanity in general. Much of this framing of the event came in reaction to an investigative article[9] in the New York Times written by Martin Gansberg and published on March 27, two weeks after the murder. The article bore the headline “Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police”; the public view of the story crystallized around a quote from the article, from an unidentified neighbor who saw part of the attack but deliberated, before finally getting another neighbor to call the police: “I didn’t want to get involved.”
Other reports, cited by Harlan Ellison in his book Harlan Ellison’s Watching, stated that one man turned up his radio so that he wouldn’t hear Genovese’s screams. Ellison says that the report he read attributed the “get involved” quote to nearly all of the thirty-eight who supposedly witnessed the attack. He later repeated the figure of thirty-eight (this time using an expletive to collectively describe them) when mentioning the case in his book The Other Glass Teat.
While Genovese’s neighbors were vilified by the article, “38 onlookers who did nothing” is a misleading conception. The article begins:
“For more than half an hour thirty-eight respectable, law-abiding citizens in Queens watched a killer stalk and stab a woman in three separate attacks in Kew Gardens.”
The lead is dramatic but factually inaccurate. None of the witnesses observed the attacks in their entirety. Because of the layout of the complex and the attacks took place in a different locations, no witness saw the entire sequence. Most only heard portions of the incident without realizing its seriousness, a few saw only small portions of the initial assault, and no witnesses directly saw the final rape and attack in an exterior hallway which resulted in Genovese’s death.[1]
The Genovese case in popular culture
* Folk singer Phil Ochs alludes to the Genovese murder in the first lines of his song “Outside a Small Circle of Friends.”
* Joan Baez, a popular folk singer of the time, wrote a song entitled, “In The Quiet Morning,” which was inspired by Genovese’s death, but later dedicated to Janis Joplin.
* In the comic book series Watchmen, the murder of Kitty Genovese is the event which compels Rorschach to become a vigilante.
* The movie The Boondock Saints opens with a preacher using the story of Kitty Genovese in a sermon to illustrate the point that passively watching a bad deed is as criminal as — or even worse than — committing the crime itself.
* A 1975 made-for-TV movie, Death Scream, was loosely based on the Kitty Genovese murder.
* The scene in John Carpenter’s Halloween (1978) in which Laurie Strode (played by Jamie Lee Curtis) cried for help while being chased by Michael Myers but was ignored by her neighbors parallels Kitty Genovese’s cries fleeing Winston Moseley.
* Harlan Ellison used the death of Genovese and the reports of her neighbors’ alleged willful inaction as the basis for “The Whimper of Whipped Dogs”, an Edgar-winning story in his “Deathbird Stories” collection.
* Dorothy Uhnak’s novel Victims (1985) drew from the Genovese murder.[10]
* A 1996 episode of Law & Order entitled “Remand” was loosely based on the Genovese case.
* In 2005, a play, The Witnesses of Kitty Genovese, written by J.R. Teeter, about the last night of Kitty Genovese’s life, was released and viewed in Off-Broadway productions. [11]
References
1. ^ a b c Kitty Genovese (English). A Picture History of Kew Gardens, NY. Retrieved on 2007-03-12.
2. ^ “Queens Woman Stabbed to Death in Front of Home”, New York Times, 1964-03-14, p. 26. Retrieved on 2007-04-11.
3. ^ Dowd, Maureen. “20 years after the murder of Kitty Genovese, The question remains: Why?”, New York Times, 1984-03-12, p. B1. Retrieved on 2007-04-11.
4. ^ Remembering Kitty Genovese, SoundPortraits, 13 March 2004
5. ^ Rosenthal, A.M. (1964). Thirty-Eight Witnesses: The Kitty Genovese Case. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-21527-3.
6. ^ Rasenberger, Jim (October 2006). “Nightmare On Austin Street“. American Heritage Magazine.
7. ^ Barry, Dan. “Once Again, A Killer Makes His Pitch”, New York Times, 2006-05-26, p. b1.
8. ^ Joe Mahoney, “Kitty’s Killer Denied Parole — Again,” “New York Daily News”, 4 February 2006.
9. ^ Martin Gansberg, “Thirty-Eight Who Saw Murder Didn’t Call the Police,” New York Times, 27 March 1964.
10. ^ Lynskey, Ed. The Original Policewoman: Dorothy Uhnak. The Mystery File.
11. ^ Bread and Water Theatre
See also…
Book
* Rosenthal, A.M. (1964). Thirty-Eight Witnesses: The Kitty Genovese Case. University of California Press. ISBN 0-520-21527-3.
External links
* Court TV’s Crime Library story on Kitty Genovese.
* Joseph De May Jr., “Kitty Genovese: What you think you know about the case might not be true.” A reinvestigation by a member of the Richmond Hill Historical Society, this comes in two versions:* Single page that analyzes and argues with Gansberg’s article, with links to other material.
* This and thirteen subsequent pages constitute a version that is more visually attractive. (Although billed as shorter, it too is comprehensive.)* “Sound Portrait” interview with Mary Ann Zielonko, Kitty Genovese’s girlfriend audio and transcript.
* Phil Ochs’ “Outside of a Small Circle of Friends” lyrics
* Kitty Genovese: Reclaiming Herstory
* A. M. Rosenthal, “Thirty-Eight Witnesses” (Online version)
* Jim Rasenberger, “Kitty 40 Years Later,” The New York Times (8 February 2004) (On the Middlesex County College Web Site)
* “Kitty Genovese, Revised” The Wilson Quarterly (Winter 2007)
* We Are All Bystanders - Greater Good Magazine article examines the bystander effect and Genovese’s death.
|
|
||
Proud To Be White
Someone finally said it. How many are actually paying attention to this?
There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, Native Americans, etc. And then there are just Americans.
You pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. You call me “White boy,” “Cracker,” “Honkey,” “Whitey,” “Caveman”. And that’s OK.
But when I call you, Nigger, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink…
You call me a racist.
You say that whites commit a lot of violence against you, so why are the ghettos the most dangerous places to live?
You have the United Negro College Fund. You have Martin Luthern King Day. You have Black History Month. You have Cesar Chavez Day. You have Ma’uled Al-Nabi You have the NAACP. You have BET. You have Miss Black America.
If we had WET (White Entertainment Television) - We’d be racists.
If we had a White Pride Day…
You would call us racists.
If we had White History Month
We’d be racists.
If we had any organization for only whites to “advance” OUR lives. We’d be racists.
We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce.
Wonder who pays for that?
If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships… You know we’d be racists. There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US , yet if were a “White college” THAT would be a racist college.
In the Million Man March, you believed that you were marching for your race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.
You are proud to be black, brown, yellow and orange, and you’re not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride.
You call us racists.
You rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer Shoots a black gang member or beats up a black drug-dealer running From the law and posing a threat to society ..
You call him a racist.
I am proud.
But, you call me a racist.
Why is it that only whites can be racists?
There is nothing improper about this e-mail.
Let’s see which of you are proud enough to send it on.
|
|
||
I said I would be posting more of these as I found them. I am sickened by what I see on the broadcasts in the middle east. Cultural differences aside I am still disturbed by much of what I see. I don’t think people really understand that we do have a problem. Additionally people don’t understand how severe this problem really is. Well more on that later…
I encourage you to watch all of these videos I am posting and the ones on other sites as well. It is important for everyone to understand what others think and are doing. CNN and Fox don’t paint an accurate picture of what is really going on around the world.
|
|
||

Recent Comments